A. As to Plaintiff A, KRW 38,093,650, KRW 460,200 to Plaintiff B, and KRW 9,729,50 to Plaintiff C, and this.

(a) Business name and public notice - Business name: Business name: - Public notice of the Bogeumjari Housing District Development Project (thirdj): Defendant on December 3, 2009, No. 2009-1140, April 27, 2010, public notice of the Ministry of Land, Transport and Maritime Affairs No. 2010-244, April 27, 2010, No. 2012-187, Apr. 17, 2012;

B. (1) The Central Land Expropriation Committee’s ruling on expropriation on December 14, 2012 - Land A, B, and C (hereinafter “instant land”) among each land indicated in the attached Form 2 compensation details - The date of expropriation: February 6, 2013 - Compensation amount as indicated in the column for the amount of adjudication on expropriation among the attached Form 2 compensation details - An appraisal corporation: An appraisal corporation on February 22, 2013 - The expropriation ruling on February 22, 2013 (hereinafter “appraisal for expropriation”): Plaintiff D, E, F, G, H, I, and J from among each land indicated in the attached Form 2 compensation details: The date of commencement of expropriation as indicated in the attached Form 2 compensation details - the same as the amount of compensation in the attached Form 2 compensation details - the same as the amount of compensation in the attached Form 1 - the same as the amount of compensation in the attached Form 21:21: the same as the amount of compensation in the attached Form 1.

C. The Central Land Tribunal’s ruling on August 22, 2013 - An objection raised by the Plaintiffs was entirely dismissed - An appraisal corporation: The Korea Land Appraisal Corporation and the Korea Land Appraisal Board (hereinafter referred to as the “Appraisal Board” in combination with an appraisal appraiser for an expropriation ruling; hereinafter collectively referred to as “appraisal of adjudication”) [based on recognition]; the facts in which no dispute exists; and the purport of the entire pleadings as indicated in Gap’s Evidence Nos. 2, 3, 4, 5, and Eul’s Evidence Nos. 1 through 8 (including the number of branch numbers for each appraisal)

2. The assertion and judgment

A. From among the 2,063 square meters of land owned by Plaintiff 1, Plaintiff 1, E, and F, the appraiser for the adjudication shall be a ditch among 33 square meters of land assessed by Plaintiff 2,063 square meters of land owned by Plaintiff 2,063, the appraiser for the adjudication among 37 square meters of land assessed by Plaintiff E as a ditch, 1,342 square meters of land owned by Plaintiff E, and 1,283 square meters of land owned by Plaintiff E prior to M as a ditch, the appraiser for the adjudication shall be a ditch.