beta
(영문) 인천지방법원 2017.01.20 2016노4819

식품위생법위반

Text

The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

Reasons

1. The decision of the court below against the defendant on the summary of the grounds for appeal (unfair sentencing) is too unreasonable.

2. Although the defendant recognizes the facts of the crime and reflects on the facts of the crime, considering the defendant's method and content, period of the crime, amount of manufactured and sold goods with false indication, etc., the defendant was punished once suspended execution due to the same veterinary act, once a sentence was sentenced to one time, and again commits the crime of this case during the period of repeated crime; there are no special circumstances or changes in circumstances that may be considered in additional punishment after the decision of the court below was rendered; and in light of other various circumstances, including the defendant's age, sex and environment, motive, means and consequence of the crime, and circumstances after the crime, etc., the defendant's assertion is not unfair because the sentence of the court below is too unreasonable.

3. In conclusion, the defendant's appeal is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act on the grounds that the defendant's appeal is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.