A shall be punished by imprisonment with prison labor for eight months and by imprisonment for six months.

, however, from the date this judgment becomes final.

1. Defendant A

A. At around July 1, 2015, the Defendant sexually insultingd the victim G by openly citing the following remarks: “Around July 21, 2015, the Defendant: (a) at the Enora week store operated by Jinju-si, with the report of Jinju-si, G of the F District District of the Jinju-si Police Station, in order to verify the process against the business owner upon receipt of a report by the Defendant; and (b) at the same place where the aforementioned D and D are in operation, the Defendant expressed to the said G: (a) “I am to be able to find out the process against the business owner; and (c) I am to the police.”

B. On July 1, 2015, around 22:05, the Defendant: (a) arrested a flagrant offender on the facts constituting an offense described in the preceding paragraph in the F District located in J, Jinju-si; and (b) was asked to ask questions about personal information, etc. from the said G; (c) assaulted G, such as spiting down, etc. of knee, knee, knee, knee, knee

Accordingly, the defendant interfered with the proper execution of duties concerning the maintenance of police officers' order and crime control.

2. On July 1, 2015, Defendant B, at around 21:45, 2015, told Defendant B to the police officer affiliated with the said F District Unit, who was called up after receiving a report to avoid disturbance, such as being under the influence of alcohol at the enoporae, etc. at the above Enopox, Defendant B sexually insultingd the victim I by openly insulting the victim at the place where Defendant D et al. was heard.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendants’ respective legal statements

1. Each police statement about G, I, and D;

1. Application of the video CD-related Acts and subordinate statutes

1. Relevant Article 311 of the Criminal Act, Article 136(1) of the Criminal Act, and Article 136(2) of the Criminal Act, Article 311 of the Criminal Act, and Article 311 of the Criminal Act, and Article 311 of the Act, and Article 311

1. Defendant A from among concurrent crimes: the former part of Article 37, Articles 38 (1) 2 and 50 of the Criminal Act;

1. Defendants on probation: The Defendants, on the grounds of sentencing of Article 62(1) of the Criminal Act, expressed their desire to the police officer without any reflection even though the police officer called out due to the influence of alcohol, and Defendant A expressed his desire to the police officer.