However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for one year from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

At around 19:20 on May 31, 2019, the Defendant: (a) listened to the opinion that B, his father, is suffering from harassment from other undergraduate forms, and (b) was exposed to the victim of the same frighting frighting frighting frighting frighting frighting frighting frighting frighting frighting frighting frighting frighting frighting frighting frighting frighting frighting frighting frighting frighting frighting frighting frighting frighting frighting frighting frighting frighting frighting frighting frighting frighting frighting frighting frighting frighting frighting frighting frighting frighting frighting frighting frighting frighting frighting.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. A protocol concerning the police interrogation of the accused;

1. Statement of police statement concerning E and C;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes on recording, recording CDs;

1. Article 283 (1) of the Criminal Act applicable to the crimes and Article 283 of the Election of Imprisonment;

1. In light of the circumstances where a child victimized by reason of sentencing under Article 62(1) of the Criminal Act was seriously shocked by the Defendant’s crime of this case and received hospitalized treatment for two weeks thereafter, a decision to punish him/her; however, considering that the Defendant’s mistake was against himself/herself, and that the victimized child was believed to have committed a crime of this case, and that he/she committed a crime of this case, he/she is believed to believe that the victimized child was able to have committed a crime of this case, and some of the circumstances may be taken into account.