However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

1. Fraud against the victim C;

A. On December 23, 2011, the Defendant: (a) around 16:00 on December 23, 2011, at the home of D Victim C; (b) the Defendant loaned the amount of money to the bond company to the Defendant; (c) the Defendant borrowed the amount of money to be repaid to the bond company; (d) monthly interest shall be paid to the five (5) installments; and (e) on April 2012, it was registered as a person who rendered distinguished services to the State; and (e) the Defendant would receive a loan from the

However, on June 28, 201, the defendant had already been granted a 3 million won loan from the Veterans' Office, but the principal and interest were overdue, so it was not possible to obtain an additional loan, and the business registration was cancelled, making it impossible to obtain a business loan. The defendant is a person with bad credit standing at the time, and the debt was 55 million won, and even if he borrowed money from the victim due to no particular income, he did not have the intent or ability to repay it.

The Defendant, as such, by deceiving the victim as such, received 6 million won from the victim as the borrowed money, namely, from the victim.

B. On July 2, 2012, the Defendant, at the home of the above victim C, must purchase clothes for the victim to carry out funeral services, at the victim’s office.

I would like to pay money to loan money even after September 2, 2012, which is the second day of two months, because he/she has sold clothes and 2-3 times the clothes.

“...”

However, even if the defendant borrowed money from the victim, he/she was thought to use it for the repayment of his/her personal debt, and even if he/she borrowed money from the victim, he/she did not have any intention or ability to repay it within a fixed period.

The Defendant, as such, by deceiving the victim, received five million won from the victim, namely, a loan, under the pretext of the loan.

2. On May 20, 2012, the Defendant against the victim E was sent to the victim’s home of the victim E, “F,” at the victim’s home on May 20, 2012.