When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

Around 01:10 on September 28, 2017, the Defendant: (a) considered that the victim E was locked on the road under the influence of alcohol on the front side of “D coffee shop” located in Jongno-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government; and (b) took advantage of the victim’s 1,00,000 won-p 1,000 won-p 1,000 won-p 1,000 won-p 1,000 won-p 1,000 won-on 3 hand-on of the market value, one hand-on 1,000 won-on 1,000 won-on 1,000 won-on 1,000 won-on 3,000 won-on 1,000 won-on 2,00 U.S. dollars 2, and stolen this.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Statement made by the police for E;

1. Police seizure records, list of seizure, and photographs of seized articles;

1. Application of the Acts and subordinate statutes to a criminal investigation report (the head of a crime, screen pictures, and screen photographs);

1. Relevant Article 329 of the Criminal Act concerning criminal facts, the choice of punishment, and the choice of fines;

1. Article 70(1) and Article 69(2) of the Criminal Act to attract a workhouse;

1. Although the sentencing of Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act is not good for the crime of this case on the grounds of sentencing of the order for provisional payment, the punishment like the order shall be determined by taking into account the following: (a) the Defendant’s reflection while committing the crime while committing the crime; and (b) the damaged articles were returned to the injured party.