However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for one year from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

On May 23, 2014, at around 01:00, the Defendant expressed the victim E, who was asked about the circumstances of the instant case from the victim E, a police officer belonging to the D District District District District of the Busan District Police Station, which was called the victim’s 'C' in front of the 'C in Bupyeong-gu, Seocheon-si, Seocheon-si, Seoul, and called the victim's breath, and interfered with the legitimate execution of duties concerning the prevention, etc. of the said E's crime, by assaulting the victim, such as: (a) flaging the victim's flap, smoking flaf, and flafing the victim's flaf; (b) flafing the victim's flaf; and (c) flafing the victim's flaf twice

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Statement to E by the police;

1. Written statement of the F;

1. The application of Acts and subordinate statutes on photographs of damage, copies of work sites, and investigation reports;

1. Relevant Article 136 (1) of the Criminal Act concerning criminal facts, the choice of a sentence, and the choice of imprisonment (the choice of imprisonment with prison labor in consideration of the degree of damage inflicted by police officers damaged);

1. Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act on the Suspension of Execution (All circumstances, such as the fact that the defendant seems to have committed the instant crime in a contingent manner under the influence of alcohol, the fact that the defendant has no criminal record other than the fine, and the defendant has committed a second offense against his/her own mistake, etc.);

1. Social service order under Article 62-2 of the Criminal Act;