A. Comprehensively taking account of the overall purport of the arguments in evidence Nos. 1 and 2, the fact of recognition that Defendant C borrowed KRW 150 million from the Plaintiff, and Defendant C, from October 30, 2019 to November 12, 2019, would pay KRW 150 million from the Plaintiff’s telephone conversations with the Plaintiff, and if the above Defendant deposited KRW 1 million in the head of Tong up to the time of the deposit, the said amount was not paid by the first month interest. If the said Defendant deposited KRW 2,000,000 in the head of Tong, then it was divided by a conversation between the two months interest and the non-paid interest, and from August 26, 2019 to August 26, 2019.

9. On August 28, 2019, the remittance of one million won to the head of the passbook D between 20.20,000 won may be recognized respectively as follows: < Amended by Presidential Decree No. 23424, Aug. 28, 2019>

B. According to the facts acknowledged as to the cause of the claim, Defendant C is obligated to pay to the Plaintiff the interest or delay damages calculated at the rate of 12% per annum under the Act on Special Cases concerning the Promotion, etc. of Legal Proceedings from August 29, 2019 to June 10, 2020, which is the date following the date of the last payment of interest, to the extent of the obligation of the Defendant to pay the loan amounting to KRW 150 million, and from August 29, 2019 to June 10, 2020, which is the date of the decision of this case (=1 million won per month x 12 months x 100 million x 100%) to the Plaintiff, and to pay the damages for delay calculated at the rate of 12% per annum under the Act on Special Cases concerning

[Plaintiff’s claim for interest calculated at the rate of 8% per annum from April 6, 2018. However, there is no evidence to acknowledge this, and this part of Plaintiff’s claim as to Defendant B’s claim is without merit.

A. The plaintiff's assertion that the plaintiff lent KRW 150 million to the defendants who are the married couple's family members, and the defendant Eul also tried to jointly and severally repay the above loan, and since the plaintiff was transferred to the plaintiff in the passbook in the name of the defendant B, the defendant Eul also has the obligation to return the above loan jointly with the defendant C.