2. The costs of appeal shall be borne by the Defendant.

Purport of claim and appeal

1...

A. The Plaintiff in his personal relations (hereinafter referred to as the “Plaintiff Company”) is an automobile comprehensive insurance insurer of the D New Fextonton Automobiles (hereinafter referred to as the “instant automobiles”) driven by C.

(see Evidence A. 7). (b)

교통사고의 발생 2014. 9. 28. 19:10경 충남 예산군 신양면 가지리 신양톨케이트 청양군 방면 전방 500m 지점의 도로에서 피고가 운전하고 피고의 동생 E이 동승한 경운기(이하 ‘이 사건 경운기’라고 한다)가 청양군 쪽에서 예산군 쪽으로 편도 1차로의 1차로를 따라 진행하던 중, C가 운전하는 이 사건 자동차가 같은 차로를 따라 같은 방향으로 진행하다가 다음 그림과 같이 이 사건 경운기의 뒷부분을 추돌하는 교통사고(이하 ‘이 사건 교통사고’라고 한다)가 났다(갑 제1, 2호증, 이 법원의 예산경찰서에 대한 2018. 7. 6.자 사실조회 회신 결과 참조). < 사고 ＃1차량이 이 사건 자동차이고, 사고 ＃2차량이 이 사건 경운기임 >

C. Until November 17, 2016, the Plaintiff Company, the insurer of the instant vehicle, paid KRW 107,670,910 as damages for the aforementioned E and the Defendant’s medical expenses, etc. injured as the victim of the instant traffic accident by November 17, 2016.

(See Evidence A No. 3) . Each statement of evidence Nos. 1, 2, 3, and 7 (if there are more than one number, the number shall be included; hereinafter the same shall apply) in the ground for recognition, the result of the fact-finding inquiry and reply to the budget police station of this court on July 6, 2018, and the purport of the whole pleadings.

2. The purport of the Plaintiff’s assertion is that the instant traffic accident contributed to the occurrence of the accident by the Defendant’s operation of the instant horse at night without installing the back side light and front light at night, thereby creating obstacles to the discovery of the instant horse operator that the insured C was proceeding in the front bank.

The defendant's fault ratio in the traffic accident of this case is the victim's fault ratio.