1. Examining the grounds of appeal by Defendant A (to the extent of supplement in case of supplemental appellate briefs not timely filed) in light of the evidence duly admitted, the lower court did not err by exceeding the bounds of the principle of free evaluation of evidence against logical and empirical rules and by exceeding the bounds of the principle of free evaluation of evidence.

In addition, the ground of appeal on the violation of the Game Industry Promotion Act among the facts charged in the instant case is the purport of disputing the circumstances that the court below decided in the grounds of sentencing, which constitutes an allegation of unfair sentencing.

According to Article 383 subparagraph 4 of the Criminal Procedure Act, only in cases where death penalty, life imprisonment, or imprisonment or imprisonment without prison labor for not less than ten years has been imposed, an appeal on the grounds of unfair sentencing is allowed. Thus, in this case where a more minor sentence has been imposed on the above defendant, the argument that the sentencing of the sentence

2. Examining the grounds of appeal by Defendant M in light of the evidence duly admitted, the judgment of the court of first instance that held that the violation of the Punishment of Violences, etc. Act (joint assault) and the violation of the Punishment of Violences, etc. Act (joint conflict) are recognized among the facts charged in the instant case does not err by exceeding the bounds of the principle of logic and experience and the principle of free evaluation of evidence. Thus, the judgment of the court below that dismissed the appeal by the said Defendant

In addition, the argument about mental disorder in the grounds of appeal is not legitimate grounds of appeal, since the above defendant's grounds of appeal are the grounds of appeal or the court below's decision is not subject to judgment ex officio.

In addition, the reasons for sentencing of the first instance court are discussed.