If the defendant does not pay the above fine, the amount of KRW 100,000 shall be paid.

The defendant is a neighbor who resides in an apartment, such as the victim B (Emb.74).

On September 25, 2018, at around 09:00 on September 25, 2018, the Defendant: (a) committed assault against E on the ground that E, a neighboring resident, was frighted in his apartment in his front of his own apartment in the Gangseo-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government C Apartment D, and that he was frighting for the victim’s face on the ground that he met himself; (b) the victim was frighted “hick, who is a fright, who is a fright, who is a fright,” and fright the victim’s face. (c) The Defendant frighted the victim, who was walking in the back of the back of the backhead of his house, and was frighted, who was

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement to E by the police;

1. Each written statement E and B;

1. Investigation report (Attachment to the victim's photograph and the 112 reported case list), investigation report (the party's report on hearing of opinions among the victims B);

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to a site dispatch report in the case

1. Relevant Article 257 (1) of the Criminal Act and the choice of a fine for the crime;

1. Articles 70 (1) and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act for the detention of a workhouse;

1. Taking into account the following: (a) even though a sufficient recognition of the crime was made by the evidence of the reason for sentencing under Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act, the attitude of pening or reflecting the offender cannot be found; and (b) the victim did not properly prosecute the victim; and (c) the victim still has been punished.