However, from the date of the conclusion of the judgment, each of the defendants is against the defendants for one year from the date of the judgment.

The Defendants expressed the Defendant’s telephone number to sell the game money in the “DPC room” located in the Gyeonggi-si, Gyeonggi-do, on December 18, 2016, and posted the Defendant’s phone number to the “Twit-si,” which had been online game, to the victim E (18 years old) who reported and contacted the above writing, for money deposit to the said victim E (18 years old).

“A false representation was made.”

However, in fact, the Defendants did not have a game machine and did not intend to sell it.

Nevertheless, the Defendants were paid KRW 19,00 from the time when they received KRW 19,00 from the injured party’s agricultural account (F) via the Defendant’s agricultural account under the name of Defendant A by the same method until January 17, 2017, and received a total of KRW 2,587,700 in the same manner as the list of crimes in attached Form 20 times, such as the list of crimes.

As a result, the defendants conspired to acquire money from victims.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendants’ respective legal statements

1. Application of the respective Acts and subordinate statutes to each statement, written statement, each transfer statement, each screen to the Kakao Stockholm to the closure of the contents of the Kakao Stockholm conversation, the screen and transfer statement to the closure of the contents of the Kakao Stockholm conversation, each reply, each screen to the closure of the contents of the conversation, the transaction statement, and the written complaint;

1. Relevant Articles 347(1) and 347(1) and 30 of the Criminal Act concerning the Defendants who choose to commit the crime;

1. Defendants who aggravated concurrent crimes: the former part of Article 37, Article 38(1)2, and Article 50 of the Criminal Act

1. Defendants on probation: Reasons for sentencing (the sentencing criteria shall not apply as the Defendants are minors) under Article 62(1) of the Criminal Act (the conditions favorable to the reasons for sentencing as set forth below).

During the short term, the Defendants committed the crime of fraud repeatedly for a short period of time, and the number of times is 20 times.

However, the defendant's confession of crime is against the law, is minor, there is no yet criminal punishment, and damage to 16 victims.