beta
(영문) 서울중앙지방법원 2015.07.23 2015고정1958

공전자기록등불실기재등

Text

Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 4,000,000.

When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

On February 3, 2010, the Defendant, at the Seoul Central District Court, sentenced 6 months of imprisonment and 1 year of suspension of qualification to the violation of the Protection of Communications Secrets Act, etc., and sentenced 2 years of suspended sentence of imprisonment, which became final and conclusive on April 27, 2010.

On November 2009, the Defendant accepted the offer to offer KRW 5,000,000 to KRW 6,000,000 in return for the entry into the country by making a disguised marriage with Vietnamer, whose name is unknown, through a disguised marriage broker in Seoul.

1. On December 17, 2009, the Defendant conspiredd with the hub for disguised marriage mediation in collusion with the public electronic records, etc., and submitted to the public official in charge of family relation registration a statement of marriage stating false facts, such as B(B), B(B) to the husband column, and a statement of marriage recognition, etc., attached to the public official in charge of family relation registration in Jung-gu civil service in Jung-gu civil service located in Jung-gu, Seoul Metropolitan Government on December 17, 2009.

The Defendant had a public official in charge of not knowing such fact enter the same electronic records as the original of a notarial deed into and register as if they were married with B in the family relations electronic data processing system, which is the same electronic records as the original of a notarial deed, and had the public official use the family relations electronic data processing system where

2. No person who violates the Immigration Control Act shall apply for a false visa or a visa issuance certificate, or assist such application to allow any foreigner to enter the Republic of Korea;

After filing a false marriage report in the same manner as described in paragraph (1), the Defendant: (a) knew that the actual purpose of entry of “B” was employment; (b) delivered to “B” a false marriage certificate, etc. requiring the entry visa; and (c) on January 15, 2010, “B” submitted a false marriage certificate, etc. to the Embassy of the Republic of Korea at the Embassy of Vietnam, the Defendant applied for the entry visa.

Summary of Evidence

1...