However, the execution of the above sentence shall be suspended for a period of two years from the date this judgment became final and conclusive.

The defendant is a person who is engaged in driving a DKa car.

On July 31, 2017, the Defendant driven the above car at around 18:29, and driven the ridge intersection, which is located in 20-3, starting from the running point of view, to the direction of the water level, led to a speed of about 20km in the direction of the water level.

At the same time, the FK5 passenger cars driven by the victim E (V, 32 years old) were stopped in the signal atmosphere, and thus, the Defendant engaged in driving service had a duty of care to prevent accidents in advance by accurately manipulating the steering direction and operation system while well living on the front side and the left side.

Nevertheless, the Defendant neglected to do so and proceeded with the above K5 vehicle due to negligence, and received the back part of the above K5 vehicle as the front part of the Defendant’s driver’s vehicle.

Ultimately, the Defendant by occupational negligence inflicted injury on the victim E, such as the right dog for about four weeks of care, and suffered injury on the victim G (e.g., women, 32 years of age) who was boarding the said K5 car in the said K5 car, for approximately two weeks of medical treatment, such as light salt and tension, and escaped without taking necessary measures, such as aiding and damaging the said K5 car to the degree of KRW 1,590,128, and aiding and abetting the damaged by stopping the said car.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Statement made in preparation of a letter of apology to E;

1. Application of the Act and subordinate statutes to a survey report on actual condition, on-site photographs, each written diagnosis, and written estimate;

1. Article 5-3 (1) 2 of the Act on the Aggravated Punishment, etc. of Specific Crimes, Article 268 of the Criminal Act, Articles 148 and 54 (1) of the Road Traffic Act concerning criminal facts (the point of view of failing to take measures after an accident) of the same Act;

1. Articles 40 and 50 of the Criminal Act of the Commercial Competition;

1. Selection of imprisonment with prison labor chosen;

1. A traffic accident that is unfavorable to the reason for sentencing under Article 62(1) of the Criminal Act (a favorable circumstance of the reason for sentencing).