When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

On August 21, 2016, at around 00:50, the Defendant informed C of the fact that the Defendant did not pay the fare on a taxi at around 302,00,000, the Nam-gu, Incheon, Nam-gu, Incheon, by having reported 112, that the Defendant would not pay the fare on a taxi, and the Defendant would pay taxes to C of the police officer of the Incheon Southern Police Station, who called to the site at the site. The Defendant would pay the same son son son son son son son son son son son son son son son son son son. The Defendant son son son son son son son son son son son son son, son son son son son son son son son son son son son son son son son son. son son son son son son son son son son son son son son son son son son son son son son son son son son son.”

Accordingly, the defendant interfered with the legitimate performance of public duties on the maintenance of public peace and order related to the handling of 112 reported cases by police officers.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Statement to C by the police;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes of E;

1. Article 136 (1) of the Criminal Act applicable to the relevant criminal facts and Article 136 of the choice of punishment (Consideration of fine, the selection of a fine, the violation of the criminal defendant and the recognition of the criminal act, and the primary fact that the criminal

1. Articles 70 (1) and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act for the detention of a workhouse;

1. Article 334 (1) of the Criminal Procedure Act of the provisional payment order;