However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for one year from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

On March 23, 2014, at around 13:55, the Defendant: (a) reported to the world pharmacy in the Ayang-ro 111(Sayang-ro), Daegu-gu, Daegu-ro, 111, on the front of the pharmacy; and (b) returned to the site by a slope C belonging to the Daegu-dong Police Station B Zone B located in the Daegu-dong Police Station, which called the site.

After that, the defendant was asked by the above C of "Isman because of what is," and C expressed that "Isn't spath, spath, spath, spathn, spathn, spathn, spathn, spathn", and assault C's bridge by using blap, spathn, spathn, spathn, spathn, etc.

Accordingly, the Defendant interfered with the legitimate execution of duties by police officers taking measures according to 112 Report.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Statement to C by the police;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to a copy of work site in the B district;

1. Article 136 (1) of the Criminal Act applicable to the crimes and Article 136 of the Election of Imprisonment;

1. Reasons for the sentencing of Article 62(1) of the Criminal Code of the Suspension of Execution [Scope of Recommendation] There is no person who has the basic area (6 to 1 year and 4 months) of the obstruction of performance of official duties (the decision of sentence] [decision of the sentence] The defendant reflects his mistake, the degree of damage to police officers seems to be relatively minor, the defendant's age, character and behavior, environment, motive or circumstance of the crime, means and consequence of the crime, etc., and all other circumstances constituting the conditions for the sentencing, including the circumstances after the crime, shall be determined as per the order.