beta
(영문) 서울남부지방법원 2013.08.29 2012고합732

특정경제범죄가중처벌등에관한법률위반(사기)등

Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for three years.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for four years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

(e).

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

The Defendant was a person who was the representative director of G Co., Ltd. (hereinafter referred to as “G”) who developed, produced, and sold Internet sharing (AP), video display, etc.

On July 12, 2010, the Defendant concluded a contract for the supply of goods within 60 days from the victim JJ (hereinafter “J”) to supply myLG0 service devices to H, Inc. (hereinafter “H”), with the head of K department, who is the employee in charge of the victim J Co., Ltd. (hereinafter “J”), to manufacture and deliver VoIP AP (Internet Wire Wire Wire Wire Wire Wire Wire Wireless Wireless Wireless Wireless Wireless Wireless Wireless Wireless) at the G office located within 1312, Guro-gu, Seoul, and issued a written confirmation to the victim J. (hereinafter “J”). In order to secure the payment of the goods, the Defendant and the victimJ opened an agricultural bank account in G’s name to jointly withdraw the deposits to be visited by the Defendant and the victim J., and on the same day, the Defendant prepared a “written confirmation of deposit account” to deposit the goods with H M Y or the above account only, and issued it to the victim J.

그러나 사실은 당시 피고인은 금융권 채무 50-60억 원 상당, 개인채무 10억 원 상당, 거래처인 H에 30억 원 상당, 대만의 주식회사 알파네트웍스(이하 ‘알파네트웍스’라 한다)에 40억 원 상당의 채무를 부담하고 있어 사실상 채무초과 상태에 있었고, 2009년경부터 H로부터 발주를 받으면 물품대금 중 선급금 70%를 지급받아 이를 제품 생산비로 사용하고 나머지 30%는 피고인의 H에 대한 기존 채무 30억 원 상당과 상계하는 방식으로 거래해 오고 있었으나 위와 같은 상황을 피해자 J에 고지하지 않았고, 또한 당시 G의 재무상황이 매우 열악하여 피해자 J로부터 VoIP AP를 공급받더라도 그 물품대금을 약속한 기한 내에 정상적으로 지급해 줄 의사나 능력이 없었다.

Nevertheless, the defendant.