However, the execution of the above sentence shall be suspended for a period of one year from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

The defendant is the victim B and South Korea.

On August 21, 2018, around 10:20 on August 21, 2018, at around the victim’s house located in Seoul Special Metropolitan City, Nowon-gu 1206 Dong 806, the Defendant: (a) laid down a small glass hold and a washing-proof network for the victim’s house on the ground that the victim did not open the front door; and (b) broken down a small glass hold so that the sum of the repair cost would be equivalent to KRW 100,000,000, and laund-proofed.

Accordingly, the defendant damaged the victim's property.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Each police statement made with respect to B or D;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes governing the 112 Reporting Case Handling List;

1. Article 366 of the Criminal Act applicable to the facts constituting an offense and Article 366 of the choice of punishment;

1. According to Article 62(1) of the Act on the Suspension of Execution, there is a record of being punished several times due to violent crimes for the reason of sentencing under Article 62(1) of the Criminal Act, the defendant recognizes and reflects the crime, the victim does not want the punishment against the defendant, and the sentencing conditions under Article 51 of the Criminal Act that are shown in the record, the sentence shall