beta
(영문) 수원지방법원 여주지원 2017.07.19 2017고단713

사문서변조등

Text

The defendant shall be exempted from punishment.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

[criminal record] On September 1, 2016, the Defendant was sentenced to two years and six months to imprisonment for a violation of the Act on the Aggravated Punishment, etc. of Specific Economic Crimes (Fraud) at the Seoul Central District Court, and the judgment became final and conclusive on December 23 of the same year. On March 24, 2017, the Defendant was issued a summary order of KRW 3 million by the same court due to the alteration of private documents.

[2] The Defendant is a person who had been working in D stores located in the branch of the Gyeonggi-gu branch of the Gyeonggi-si from August 21, 2015 to March 23, 2016, as a person who had been working in D stores in D stores in the branch of the Gyeonggi-gu branch of the Gyeonggi-gu branch of the Gyeonggi-gu branch of the Gyeonggi branch of the Gyeonggi branch of the Seoul branch of the Dong branch of the Dong branch of the Dong branch of the Dong branch of the Dong branch

The Defendant altered the sales amount stated in the column for the joint book of the purchase receipt of the above store in the name of C representative G, and presented the altered purchase receipt to E and F, and committed it as if Chinese customers ordered large-scale goods. In doing so, the Defendant attempted to acquire money by deceiving EF as if it would be possible for Chinese customers to receive fees from Chinese customers when settling accounts instead of the price of the goods ordered by Chinese customers.

Accordingly, on February 11, 2016, the Defendant: (a) at the Imun-gu located in the branch of the Gyeonggi-si branch of the Gyeonggi-si branch; (b) used a slickner to set up a copy of the purchase receipt issued in the D branch; (c) changed the sum of the above purchase receipts to “4,500,000”; and (d) printed out it using the slickter.

Then, the Defendant, on the same day, taken the Defendant’s mobile phone camera, created a photographic file by photographing the Defendant’s purchase receipt altered as above, and transmitted the aforementioned photographic file to E as if it was duly formed with the Kakao Stockholm.

In addition, the defendant shall exercise his right as shown in the list of crimes attached hereto between around that time and March 20, 2016.