The Defendants did not pay the above fines.

Defendant

A and E are private taxi drivers, and Defendant B is a taxi passenger operated by E.

1. Defendant A: (a) around August 28, 2015, at around 01:50, the Defendant sent a signal, waiting in front of the F, etc. in front of the Seoul Southernbuk-gu, Seoul, to the front of the signal, etc.; and (b) on the ground that the victim E was at the time of stopping, the Defendant was at sight in order to circumvent the vehicle behind.

피고인은 피해자에게 ‘야 이 씹할 놈 아 왜 빵빵거려, 개새끼야 “라고 욕을 하는 등 약 10 여분에 걸쳐 피해자를 공연히 모욕하였다.

2. Defendant B’s Defendant B, on the same date and at the same place as above 1, did not deduct the victim A from his vehicle, took a mutual bath with E and take a trial expense, and whether the victim, who was landed from the taxi operated by E, “I am dys with a thing other than the same taxi driver?”

The victim, who caused the defect in the phrase "n't know about the head of the Myanmar, was assaulted one time by the victim's head on the ground that the victim was fl't know about the head and fl't know about the head of the Myanmar, and fl't talk about the part of the victim's fl't.

Summary of Evidence

[Judgment No. 1]

1. Each legal statement of witness E and B;

1. The protocol of interrogation of each police officer in relation to E and B;

1. A complaint, written statement, and written statement of E [the facts under subparagraph 2 of the judgment];

1. A legal statement of a witness;

1. A protocol concerning the examination of suspect of the police officer;

1. Application of the written complaint and the written statement to A;

1. Relevant Article of the Act and the choice of punishment for the crime;

A. Defendant A: Article 311 of the Criminal Act (Optional to the punishment)

B. Defendant B: Article 260(1) of the Criminal Act (Optional to a punishment)

1. Defendants to be detained in the workhouse: Articles 70(1) and 69(2) of the Criminal Act;

1. Defendants of the provisional payment order: Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act