If the defendant does not pay the above fine, KRW 100,000.

On March 15, 2014, the Defendant agreed to operate Hopon as a partnership business by investing half of the amount with the victim E in the office of licensed real estate agent in Kuri-si, the Defendant entered into a contract for acquisition of the rights (facilities) with the owner of Gju located in Kuri-si, and the above Gju located in Kuri-si, which entered into a contract for acquisition of the rights (facilities) with the owner of Gju located in Kuri-si, and the Defendant entered into a contract for acquisition of the rights (facilities) with the above Gju-si. However, the Defendant already agreed to the above H and the premium 5 million won, but the Defendant entered into a contract for acquisition of the right (facilities) with the said G.

The Defendant, by deceiving the victim as such, had the victim disburse KRW 15 million under the name of the lease deposit, but the Defendant acquired pecuniary benefits equivalent to KRW 4750,000,000,000,000,000, which is the difference with the difference between the amount to be paid when he had agreed to bear half of the amount necessary for acquiring the house by paying KRW 5,500,000,000 for the premium to be paid by the victim.

Summary of Evidence

1. Partial statement of the defendant;

1. Each legal statement of witness E, H and I;

1. A contract for the acquisition or transfer of each right, and a monthly rent contract for a commercial building;

1. Application of the Acts and subordinate statutes to the complaint;

1. Relevant Article 347 (1) of the Criminal Act concerning the facts constituting a crime and Article 347 (1) of the Selection of Fine;

1. Articles 70 (1) and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act for the detention of a workhouse;

1. Article 334 (1) of the Criminal Procedure Act of the provisional payment order;