For the reasons indicated in its reasoning, the lower court upheld the first instance judgment that acquitted the facts charged in the instant case on the grounds that there was no proof of such crime.

In light of the records, the above determination by the court below is acceptable, and contrary to the allegations in the grounds of appeal, there were no errors in finding facts contrary to logical and empirical rules or by misapprehending the legal principles on the crime of violating the Juvenile Protection Act.

Therefore, the appeal is dismissed. It is so decided as per Disposition by the assent of all participating Justices on the bench.