If the defendant does not pay the above fine, 50,000 won.

On February 2, 2013, at around 03:55, the Defendant: (a) threatened the victim slope F (year 51) belonging to the E District District, who was called up after receiving a report on taxi charges from C in front of the Sinsan City Mahappo-gu B, with the report on taxi charges, and caused the victim’s slope F (year 51) to ask for personal information and other information and pay the taxi charges; (b) threatened the victim with the victim’s desire to “nick, Chewing, and Chewing,” and interfere with the victim’s legitimate performance of duties concerning the reported taxi business for about 20 minutes, including: (c) he/she interfered with the victim’s vehicle patrol in front of the E District to prevent the victim from carrying out his/her vehicle patrol at the front of the E District.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Application of each police protocol to D and F

1. Relevant Article 136 (1) of the Criminal Act concerning criminal facts, the choice of fines, and the choice of fines;

1. Articles 70 and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act for the detention of a workhouse;

1. Article 57 of the Criminal Act including days of pre-trial detention;

1. Article 334 (1) of the Criminal Procedure Act of the provisional payment order;