However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

[criminal power] On February 15, 2008, the Defendant issued a summary order of KRW 1.5 million for the crime of violation of the Road Traffic Act at the Jung-gu District Court on February 15, 2008, and a summary order of KRW 2 million for the same crime at the Gangnam Branch of the Chuncheon District Court on June 25, 2010.

【Criminal Facts】

On January 6, 2013, at around 21:55, the Defendant driven a CPoter-II truck under the influence of alcohol content of approximately 0.093% at a distance of about 2 km from the front of the “gambling frequency” set forth in the order book of Gangseo-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government, and around 22:05 on the same day, to the front road of the sewage terminal treatment plant located in Gangseo-si, Gangseo-si, Jung-si, the Defendant driven a Cpoter-II truck.

Accordingly, the Defendant, who violated the prohibition of driving under the influence of alcohol not less than twice, was driving a motor vehicle under the influence of alcohol again.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Report on the results of the crackdown on drinking driving and the statement on the state of drinking drivers;

1. Previous offense: Application of Acts and subordinate statutes of a criminal investigation report (Attachment of a copy of summary order);

1. Relevant Article of the Act on Criminal facts and Articles 148-2 (1) 1 and 44 (1) of the Road Traffic Act which choose the penalty;

1. Discretionary mitigation (i.e., the fact that the defendant is against his/her gender and the circumstances in which the defendant was driving) under Articles 53 and 55 (1) 3 of the Criminal Act;

1. Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act ( repeatedly taking into account the grounds for discretionary mitigation);

1. An order to attend a course is rendered for not less than Article 62-2 of the Criminal Act;