2. The selector;

(a) project approval and public notice - C Project (hereinafter “instant project”) - Public notice E of Daegu Metropolitan City on March 2, 2010, and public notice E of Daegu Metropolitan City on January 31, 2011

(b) Project operator: Defendant;

(c) Decision on expropriation made on June 8, 201 by the Regional Land Expropriation Committee of Daegu Metropolitan City - subject to expropriation: F forest land 1,137 square meters (hereinafter referred to as “instant land”): Daegu-gun District Land Expropriation Committee (hereinafter referred to as “instant land”): July 28, 201 - Compensation for losses: 18,476,250 won: State Appraisal Corporation and Korea Appraisal Board;

(d) Decision on expropriation made on December 7, 201 by the local land expropriation committee of Daegu Metropolitan City - Objects subject to expropriation: F forest land 1,137 square meters above ground in Daegu-gun (hereinafter “instant obstacles”): The starting date of expropriation: January 28, 2012 - Compensation for losses: 5,835,000 won: the national land appraisal corporation and the Korea Appraisal Board;

E. The Central Land Tribunal’s ruling on an objection (hereinafter “the instant ruling”) dated January 13, 2012 - Contents of the ruling: KRW 18,533,100 for the instant land; KRW 5,974,00 for the instant obstacles; and KRW 5,974,00 for the compensation of losses for the instant obstacles; and the Selection B’s request for exclusion from land expropriation; and the Selection B’s request for exclusion from land expropriation: An appraisal corporation: a corporation dialogue appraisal corporation; a single appraisal appraisal corporation (hereinafter “appraisal”) (hereinafter collectively referred to as “appraisal”) [based on recognition”)] without dispute; (i) the facts that there is no dispute; (ii) the evidence Nos. 7-1, 2, 8-1, 2, 9-1, 2-2, and 9-1, and 2

2. The plaintiff's assertion (the appointed party, hereinafter "the plaintiff") is as follows.

The appraisal of this case is unlawful by evaluating the land and obstacles of this case excessively low, so the defendant shall pay the difference with the legitimate compensation.

3. It is as stated in the relevant laws and regulations attached thereto.

4. Of the instant lawsuit, the part seeking payment of money to the Plaintiff is lawful, regarding acquisition of land, etc. for public works and compensation therefor.