However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

On March 29, 2014, at around 19:10 on March 29, 2014, the Defendant driven C Poter Cargo Vehicles with approximately 5 km alcohol concentration of 0.172% in the area of approximately 0.172 meters from the senior citizens’ homes located under the Bupyeong-gu, Pyeongtaek-gu, Gangwon-do, Pyeongtaek-gu, Pyeongtaek-gu, to the three-dimensional distance in the same Eup.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to notification of the report on the statement of the state of drinking drivers, the results of the control of drinking driving, and the results of the control of drinking driving;

1. Relevant Article of the Act on the Crime and Articles 148-2 (2) 2 and 44 (1) of the Road Traffic Act that selects the penalty;

1. Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act;

1. The reasons for sentencing under Article 62-2 of the Criminal Act include the fact that the defendant had been already punished several times due to the violation of the Road Traffic Act, and that the defendant's age, happiness, family environment, and circumstances after committing a crime, etc., and all kinds of sentencing conditions prescribed in Article 51 of the Criminal Act, which can be known through the oral argument,