However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for one year from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

The Defendant was a person who driven a D business taxi owned by the Gangseo-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government “C” in the Gangseo-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government, and, if a taxi passenger is a foreigner, was able to obtain money by using the fact that it is vulnerable to the domestic geographic and fare system, etc. and that it is difficult to receive a report of damage and a payment of damage after departure from Korea.

Therefore, around 12:27 on November 26, 2014, the Defendant: (a) sent the victim E from the taxi platform of the Incheon Airport located in the Jung-gu Incheon Airport to the said taxi; (b) received taxi charges from the said victim after arriving at the G hotel located in Seongbuk-gu Seoul, Seoul, the destination of the victim; and (c) received the payment of the taxi charges from the said victim; (d) despite the fact that the settlement amount of taxi meters was 56,600 won and the sum of 7,600 won for the above amount and the sum of 64,200 won for the 85,300 won at a time, and issued the receipt printed from the victim at KRW 85,30,00,00 to the victims, and (e) received the difference between 200,000,0000 won from 20,0000,0000 won and 34,000,000 won from the victim’s credit card and 14,05,0.7.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Examination protocol of the accused by prosecution;

1. Detailed statement of detection by enforcement officers, e-mail (original text), taxi charge receipts, credit card transaction details by date of use, details of transactions by credit card transaction, business details analysis, each comprehensive operation details, dispatch table, log A, logbook receipt, and details of transactions by each date of use;