A. The Defendant was the 12 representative of the Dobong-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government D Apartment (hereinafter “instant apartment”), and the Plaintiffs were the Dong representative of each of the instant apartment.

B. On July 18, 2012, the Defendant: (a) in the apartment management office of this case, even if the facts were not the Plaintiffs’ inhuman relations, the head of the management office and the employees of the management office, etc. were heard; (b) the Plaintiff was aware of the Plaintiff A’s “Is that he was unable to do so because he did not have a flickly flickly flickly flickly flickly flickly flickly flickly flickly flickly flickly flick.”

(hereinafter referred to as “the instant defamation”) was prosecuted for committing an offense, and was pronounced not guilty in the first instance court (Seoul Northern District Court 2012 High Court 2928), but was convicted in the appellate court (Seoul Northern District Court 2013No657) and sentenced to a fine of one million won. The said appellate court judgment became final and conclusive on November 14, 2011.

C. On July 6, 2012, the Plaintiff filed a complaint as above with the Defendant as defamation, and the Defendant accused the Plaintiff for the suspicion that the Plaintiff’s intimidation and attacked the Defendant’s apartment management office E by threatening or threatening the Defendant (hereinafter “instant accusation”), and the Prosecutor issued a disposition against the Plaintiff without suspicion (Evidence of Evidence).

In addition, on August 10, 2012, the Defendant filed a complaint with the Defendant for the suspicion that, in front of the latter part of the 160-dong apartment building of this case, Plaintiff A had openly damaged the Defendant’s reputation, the Defendant filed a complaint with F on the charge of “the charge that, without a discount, Plaintiff A purchased her bread at 1.5 million won, without a discount, purchased her bread at 1.5 million won, and used her apartment money in mind by inserting 40,000 won oil into her own vehicle, her apartment money should not be used, and her apartment can not be put into her seat.”