The lower court, based on its stated reasoning, determined that the carried phone (No. 1) seized constituted an object subject to forfeiture, which was provided for a crime.

Examining the relevant legal principles and the evidence adopted by the first instance court maintained by the lower court, such determination by the lower court is justifiable, and contrary to what is alleged in the grounds of appeal, the lower court did not err by misapprehending the legal doctrine on confiscation under Article 48(1) of the Criminal Act.

Therefore, the appeal is dismissed. It is so decided as per Disposition by the assent of all participating Justices on the bench.