When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

At around 01:00 on March 14, 2020, the Defendant received 112 report to the effect that he was assaulted on the street in front of the drinking house B and C, and confirmed the Defendant’s personal information that he was dispatched to the site by the slope E belonging to the Dog-gu Police Station D District Unit of the Yeongdeungpo-dong Police Station, Chungcheongnam-gu, Seoul, and confirmed the disturbance at the site, and used the Defendant’s statement to “Ig Dog Dog Dog Dog Dog Dog Dog Dog-do Dog Dog Dog Dog-do,” and used the Defendant’s own drinking to “Ig Dog Dog Dog Dog Dog Dog h h h h h h h h h h h h n

Accordingly, the Defendant interfered with the legitimate execution of duties of police officers concerning the handling of 112 reported cases.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Statement to E by the police;

1. Investigation report (on-site situation, etc.), investigation report (to attach patrol car records and CCTV images inside a police box);

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes on the field photographs and the 112 Reporting Case List;

1. Relevant Article 136 (1) of the Criminal Act concerning criminal facts, the choice of fines, and the choice of fines;

1. Articles 70 (1) and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act for the detention of a workhouse;

1. Although the crime of this case committed by a defendant for the reason of sentencing under Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act of the provisional payment order is not good, the defendant's acknowledgement of the crime of this case reflects the fact that the defendant is the first offender who has no record of criminal punishment, the defendant's age, character and conduct, environment, family relationship, motive and circumstance of the crime, and other various conditions of sentencing including circumstances after the crime shall be determined as per the order.