beta
(영문) 서울행정법원 2020.09.09 2019구단63853

요양불승인처분취소

Text

1. The plaintiff's claim is dismissed.

2. The costs of lawsuit shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

Reasons

1. Details of the decision not to approve the medical treatment;

A. On November 23, 2017, the Plaintiff (B male) served in several places of business, such as the mining center from around 1974, and retired from C on November 23, 2017. On December 7, 2017, the Defendant’s Thai Hospital, who was 70 years of age, was inspected by the MRI on the same day on the following day by filing a petition for the “fluority of the parts of the trees that continued for four months, and both upper parts of the upper parts of the trees,” and filed a complaint with the same hospital on February 7, 2018.

B. At the above hospital, the Plaintiff diagnosed the “scopic diversified signboard escape certificate,” the “scopic dopic dopic vertebrate,” the “scopic scopic scopic scopic scopic scopic scopic scopic scopic scopic scopic and collision scopic scopic scopic”

C. On June 22, 2018, according to the following deliberation results by the Seoul Occupational Disease Determination Committee, the Defendant’s U.S. branch office is “the instant disposition” against the Plaintiff on June 22, 2018

AB made it.

As a result of the verification of the medical image submitted, it is confirmed that the extreme part-time salt on both sides of a minor degree, the collision of the dogs between both sides, the external part-time team, the external part-time team of both sides, and the spine in six sections from 2 to 6 in the Gyeong-dole. However, it is not confirmed the escape card of a conical signboard from 2 to 6 sections in the Gyeong-dole.

The plaintiff worked as a light source in the mining station by 2003, and since 2004, it was investigated that the boiler source was the boiler maintenance and repair work, the work as a day-time worker and a forest fire surveillance worker in the construction site after the retirement of the mining station, and performed the remaining management work of the golf course for the last about 11 months.

The plaintiff, until 2003, performed mine operations as a mining source, but performed its operations since 2004, is judged to have been engaged in low work relevance.