However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

On June 12, 2015, at the main point of “C” located in Yeongdeungpo-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government on June 12, 2015, the Defendant: (a) heard the horses “I am, I am, I am, I am, I am, I am, I am, I am, I am, I am, I am, I am, I am, I am, I am, I am, I am, I am, I am, I am, I am, I am, I am, I am, I am, I am, I am, I am, I am, I am, I am, I am, I am, I am, I am, I am, I am, I am, I am am, I am, I am am, I am am on the front of the son's son's son's work.”

Summary of Evidence

1. Partial statement of the defendant;

1. The police statement concerning F;

1. G statements;

1. Scenes, evidentiary photographs, and photographs of damaged police officers;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to a copy of patrol post;

1. Relevant Article 136 (1) of the Criminal Act, the choice of criminal punishment, and the choice of imprisonment;

1. Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act;

1. The reason for the sentencing of Article 62-2 of the Criminal Act on Probation and Social Service Order [Scope of Recommendation] The basic area (6 months to one year and four months) of the obstruction of performance of official duties (the execution of official duties) [no special person] [decision of sentence] although the defendant had been sentenced to a suspended sentence of imprisonment with prison labor added to the community service order for the same crime, it is not good that the defendant has committed the crime in this case again when he committed the crime in this case.

However, a punishment shall be determined according to the sentencing guidelines in consideration of the defendant's age, character and conduct, circumstances after committing an offense, etc., and probation shall be suspended on condition that the defendant is subject to social service.