If the defendant does not pay the above fine, KRW 100,000.

On December 15, 2015, the Defendant assaulted D’s right shoulder part of D with the police officer’s hand to check the personal information of the Defendant, as well as the horses, such as the defect that D’s police officers belonging to the said district unit want to verify the personal information of the Defendant, and the defect that D’s d’s d’s d’s d’s d’s d’s h’s h’s h’s h’s h’s h’s h’, etc., at the Cheongju-si Police Station B at the Cheongju-si, Cheongju-si.

Accordingly, the Defendant interfered with the legitimate execution of duties by police officers concerning the handling of 112 reports.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes on police statements made to D and E;

1. Article 136 (1) of the Criminal Act applicable to the relevant criminal facts and Article 136 of the choice of punishment;

1. Article 70(1) and Article 69(2) of the Criminal Act to attract a workhouse;

1. An act of obstructing the execution of official duties by assaulting a police officer on the grounds of sentencing under Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act of the Criminal Procedure Act, which is disadvantageous to the defendant, is the fact that the punishment is highly necessary. The fact that the defendant led to confession of and reflect against the instant crime, and that the degree of assault against the police officer is not severe is favorable to the defendant.

In addition to the above circumstances, all the sentencing conditions shown in the records and arguments of this case shall be determined as per the disposition.