A. The party relations 1) The Plaintiff is a company running the pelp manufacturing business, etc. in the Gap Plant E and the 7th ground factory (hereinafter “Plaintiff factory”), and the Defendant Co., Ltd. (hereinafter “Defendant C”) is a company running the step-p-p-p-p-p-p-p-p-p-p-p-p-p-p-p-p-p-p-p-p-p-p-p-p-p-p-p-p-p-p-p-p-p-p-p-p-p-p-p-p-p-p-p-p-p-p-p-p-p-p-p-p-p-p-p-p-p-p-p-p-p-p

B. (1) On May 21, 2013, Defendant C contracted the work of building the Defendant C factory to H in KRW 35 million. (2) On June 9, 2013, 2013, the Defendant C carried out a melting work among steel-frameing work to complete the slope of the above passage in the course of construction with concrete over the passage connecting the second floor of the manufacturing building of the Defendant C factory and the commercial building with a warehouse, around 3:30, 2013.

3) On the right side of the place where H had been employed as above, a large number of 2m in length, 4m in height, and 4m in length in the Defendant C plant were loaded. However, a fire was caused by the fire that occurred during the above melting work, which was loaded around approximately 1m away from the site of the work, and the fire that started at Defendant C plant was destroyed by the Plaintiff’s factory, and the Plaintiff’s machinery, equipment, and products produced in the Plaintiff factory were transferred to the Plaintiff factory (hereinafter “instant fire accident”). [Grounds for recognition] Nos. 1, 2, 7, 9, 10, 11, and 16 evidence (including serial number), No. 1, 1, and 16 evidence (including evidence No. 1, 1, 1, 1, and 1, 16 evidence No.

2. Whether or not liability for damages has arisen.