The costs of appeal are assessed against the Plaintiff.

For the reasons indicated in its reasoning, the lower court rejected the Plaintiff’s assertion that the statute of limitations for acquiring possession by the Defendants was completed, and that such possession constitutes possession by a third party, by recognizing the fact that L, etc., the holder of the ownership registration of each forest listed in the separate sheet No. 2 of the lower judgment, and his successors, from November 5, 1964 to November 5, 1964, occupy each forest in peace and openly and openly for at least 20 years

The judgment below

Examining the reasoning in light of the relevant legal principles and records, the lower court’s aforementioned determination is justifiable.

In so doing, contrary to what is alleged in the grounds of appeal, there were no errors by misapprehending the legal doctrine regarding possession of forest land or autonomous possession, or by exceeding the bounds of the principle of free evaluation

Therefore, all appeals are dismissed, and the costs of appeal are assessed against the losing party. It is so decided as per Disposition by the assent of all participating Justices on the bench.