On December 2, 2013, the Defendant introduced the victim E, who had been operating clothes stores in Ulsan-gu C as the leader of the "C Headquarters" team of the Hansan-gu Co., Ltd., and introduced the name cards containing the same contents to the victim as the victim, who was receiving an annual salary for his own money and owned a large amount of property, such as high-priced real estate, etc., and led the victim to enter into a relationship with the victim from January 2014.

Then, around January 2014, the Defendant concluded that “The Defendant would pay 10 billion won to the victim in return for the loan construction business with the money from the Gyeongnam-gu Changwon, Ulsan-gu. However, in the process, a lot of taxes were imposed and the payment was not made, and if the Defendant borrowed money from the money in return for the payment of delinquent taxes, it would be repaid.”

However, as the Defendant introduced the victim, the Defendant was not an employee of the Han Composition who received a high amount of annual salary. From around 2011, the Defendant was in a bad credit standing because of the Defendant’s failure to repay debts equivalent to KRW 30 million, such as delinquent taxes, loans from financial institutions, credit cards, etc., and was in a bad credit position. The Defendant’s father’s father’s father’s son was in the construction project and paid 10 billion won of the 10 billion won of the Gyeongnam Changwon, and there was no intention or ability to repay the money even if he borrowed money from the victim.

Nevertheless, the Defendant, as seen above, by deceiving the victim and by deceiving the victim, remitted the amount of KRW 4 million from the victim on January 28, 2014, and acquired it by fraud.

In addition, from around that time to March 18, 2016, the Defendant received a total of KRW 75,020,000 from the victim over 23 times, such as the list of crimes in the attached list of crimes.

Summary of Evidence

1. Partial statement of the defendant;

1. Police and suspect examination protocol of the accused;

1. The police and the prosecutor’s protocol of statement regarding E.