However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for one year from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

The defendant is a person engaged in driving Ci30 automobiles.

On August 1, 2015, the Defendant driven the said vehicle under the influence of blood alcohol level of 0.189% from the three-distance in front of the Goyang-dong Office Dtel in Goyang-gu, Mangyang-si to drive the said vehicle in the direction of alcohol level of 0.189%, and escaped without necessary measures, such as repair cost, checking damage by immediately stopping the vehicle, and providing relief to the injured party E (the F of the indictment appears to have been written by the prosecutor) who entered the red-fluor on the road facing the Defendant’s side.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Police suspect interrogation protocol regarding E;

1. Traffic accident actual condition survey report, accident detection report, and accident report of the drinking driver;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes governing vehicle photographs;

1. Relevant provisions of Article 148, Article 54 (1) of the Road Traffic Act, Article 148-2 (2) 2, and Article 44 (1) of the Road Traffic Act concerning the facts constituting an offense, and the choice of imprisonment with prison labor;

1. Of concurrent crimes, the former part of Article 37, Articles 38 (1) 2 and 50 of the Criminal Act;

1. Consideration such as the fact that the defendant under Article 62 (1) of the suspended execution of the Criminal Act repents his mistake, that there is no criminal power, that there is a first offender who has no criminal power, that there was compensation and agreement for damages to the victim, and that there was an additional damage and change of damage through the comprehensive automobile insurance;

1. Order to attend lectures under Article 62-2 of the Criminal Act;