The defendant is a person who is engaged in the operation of a stable flag-fashion vehicle in Criberopos.

On July 25, 2016, the Defendant driven the above vehicle at around 12:00, and got the U.S. to drive the front road D in front of the Sinung-si at the flood of the river at the flood of the river at the flood of the Sinung-dong, with the flow of the road at an irregular speed depending on the flow of the three-lanes of the road at the flood.

There is a place where the center line of yellow solid lines is installed, and in such a case, there was a duty of care to prevent accidents by driving a motor vehicle safely at the place where the internship is permitted and driving a motor vehicle in accordance with traffic signals.

Nevertheless, the Defendant neglected this and caused injury to the victim, such as 12 chest pulverization that requires approximately 12 weeks of treatment of the victim E(60) driving, which was placed in the opposite opposite opposite lane due to the negligence of the central line, due to the shock of the front part of the driver’s vehicle of the victim E(60) driving, and the victim suffered about 12 weeks of treatment.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. E statements;

1. Data for the closure of an accident video;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes of a medical certificate;

1. The reason for sentencing of Article 3(1) and (2) proviso of the Act on Special Cases Concerning the Settlement of Traffic Accidents, and Article 3(1) and (2) proviso of the Act on Special Cases Concerning the Settlement of Traffic Accidents, and Article 268 of the Criminal Act / [the scope of the recommended sentence] where the illegality in the aggravated area (8-2 years or more) (excluding the special aggravated person) of Article 3(2) proviso (8) of the Act on Special Cases Concerning the Traffic Accidents (excluding the special aggravated person) is serious (2 or more provisos) of the aggravated area (8-2 years) [the decision of sentencing] Where the defendant violated the signal and suffered serious injury to the victim due to the negligent negligence committed by the central line, it is inevitable to sentence the defendant against the defendant, taking into account that the damage was not recovered.

However, it is against the defendant, it is difficult for the defendant to observe the family situation, and it is the liability insurance of the sea vehicle.