The defendant is a person who is engaged in driving a vehicle with C investment vehicle.

On June 14, 2017, the Defendant driven the above car at around 00:20, and made the front of the D-si at the port of nuclear power to turn to the left at the seat of the U.S. head office of the U.S., Mat-ju, Seoul, Seoul, one-lane from the distance inside the wharf.

Since there was a cross-section where signal lights are installed, there was a duty of care for a person engaged in driving motor vehicles to drive motor vehicles safely in accordance with the new code.

Nevertheless, the Defendant neglected this and neglected to turn to the left in contravention of the red signals signals and received a part of the front part of the passenger car of the victim E(60) driving of the victim E(60 years) who was in a direct manner in accordance with the normal signals from the part facing the Defendant.

Ultimately, the Defendant caused injury to the victim E by negligence in the course of performing the above duties to the victim E, such as damage to the part of the main body, which is unclear in detail, which requires approximately 32 weeks of treatment. The Defendant suffered injury to the victim G (19 years of age) who was on board a low-class passenger vehicle operated by the Defendant, including the right side inside the right side, which requires approximately 3 weeks of treatment, and at the same time damaged the victim E-owned body so that the first car is not repaired.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Statement made by the police with H;

1. A report on the occurrence of a traffic accident, a report on the actual condition investigation, and a map of the site;

1. Report on internal investigation (including data verifying black boxes), investigation report (verification of traffic ctv video recording images);

1. Each written diagnosis;

1. Application of statutes on site photographs;

1. Article 3 (1) and the proviso to Article 3 (2) of the Act on Special Cases concerning the Settlement of Traffic Accidents, Article 268 of the Criminal Act, Article 151 of the Road Traffic Act concerning criminal facts;

1. The defendant with reasons for sentencing under Articles 40 and 50 of the Commercial Concurrent Crimes Act did not have any history of criminal punishment, deposit 35 million won for the victim E, and the victim G did not want to be punished, and the defendant himself.