Defendant

A In fines of KRW 3,00,000, KRW 2,000, KRW 3,000, KRW 2,000, KRW 300, Defendant C in fine of KRW 1,20,00.

Defendant A of “2012 Highest 522” is the chairperson of the I University and the joint representative of the Faculty Council of the I University; Defendant B is the joint representative of the I University Professors; Defendant C is the joint representative of the I University Professors; Defendant D is the head of the I University Faculty; Defendant F is the head of the I University Union Union branch as the faculty of the I University; Defendant E is the head of the I University Student Faculty; Defendant E is the Head of the I University Student Faculty; Defendant E is the total faculty of the I University University; and Defendant G is the vice-chairperson of the I University Faculty.

Since the mid-190s, the International Private Teaching Institute has been operated as a temporary director system appointed by the Minister of Education and Human Resources Development without excluding regular directors from the operation of school juristic persons due to the corruption of the president, etc., and on 2003, appointed 9 regular directors in a temporary society consisting of temporary directors, the Supreme Court sentenced the resolution of the board of directors on May 17, 2007 that the resolution of the board of directors is invalid.

Accordingly, the Ministry of Education, Science and Technology made a decision on August 2010 by appointing four former directors, two members in the school, two members in the competent authorities, one temporary director, and the so-called Emergency Countermeasure Committee comprised of representatives in the I University Professors Council, representatives in the staff and labor union, representatives in the Dong Assembly, and representatives in the student association. The decision of the former Private School Dispute Mediation Committee, which is called the so-called "Gu Foundation," which is called the so-called "Gu Foundation, led the formation of public opinion in the school, and led the formation of public opinion by making it possible for the former president to return to the school, which is called the so-called "Gu Foundation," and it was decided to respond to the appointment of the above regular directors in the private school dispute mediation committee by denying the entry of the former directors including J, and by preventing the holding of the board of directors.

1. Defendants A, B, C, D, and E co-principal offenders are reappointed and promoted by the board of directors appointed according to the decision of the above Private School Dispute Mediation Committee on January 201.