If the defendant does not pay the above fine, the amount of KRW 100,000 shall be paid.

Defendants and victims C (the age of 41, South) are street keepers.

At around 13:00 on June 4, 2016, the Defendant interfered with the legitimate duties of the victim by force, such as: (a) the victim’s fat, fat, fat, fat, fat, fat, fat, fat, fat, fat, and fat, fat, of the D building, on the ground that the victim’s fat was deprived of her her fat in front of the building; and (b) the victim’s fat, on the fat, displayed and sold his fat, and fat, displayed her fat, and talking.

Summary of Evidence

1. Each legal statement of witness E and C;

1. The purport of the statement in part of the police interrogation protocol against the defendant ("the victim called the robbery", and the purport of the victim's seat was not the place where the defendant had been on funeral service before)

1. The defendant and his defense counsel asserts that the illegality of the act of a political party is excluded, since C committed the instant crime in order to eliminate such an unfair invasion by cutting away the place where he gets off from the place where he gets off his cell phone pictures.

Witness

In light of E and C’s testimony, unlike the defendant’s assertion, C appears not to have taken the place where the defendant had been sleeped in the past, and further, as long as the defendant committed the above act while putting a bath, it does not seem that the means or method of the act is reasonable.

Therefore, the defendant's act cannot be viewed as a justifiable act.

Therefore, we cannot accept the defendant's and defense counsel's arguments.

Application of Statutes

1. Relevant Article 314 (1) of the Criminal Act concerning criminal facts, the choice of a fine, and the choice of a fine;

1. Articles 70 (1) and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act for the detention of a workhouse;

1. Article 334 (1) of the Criminal Procedure Act of the provisional payment order;

1. Article 186 (1) of the Criminal Procedure Act to bear litigation costs;