국가보안법위반
The Defendant is not guilty. The summary of the judgment of this case is publicly notified.
1. The summary of the facts charged in this case is that the Defendant: (a) on October 30, 1978, at around 2:00 p.m., at the time of ordinary government policies; (b) on Oct. 30, 1978, the Defendant: (c) inserted the name and omitted in the residence of Dongdaemun-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government; (d) read the D Party newsletter; and (c) read the article in this article; and (d) criticizes the D Party E in this manner; (b) “I will see how and how much the Egrgs are unreciated with the Egrgs, and how much the Egrgs are raised; and (d) I will not see the Egrhs in this case. However, I will not believe that I will receive the Egrhs as the current president by inserting the Egrhs, which will distort the law of the Republic of Korea by inserting it.”
2. Determination
A. In a case where the repealed or invalidated penal law is null and void since the beginning of the statute, the statutes to be applied to a case prosecuted by the court for which a new trial was initiated for a case subject to the application of the said statute, are the statutes at the time of a new judgment. Thus, in a case where the statutes at the time of the judgment subject to new trial were repealed, the court shall render a judgment of acquittal for the
However, in a case where the penal law has retroactively lost its effect due to the Constitutional Court’s decision of unconstitutionality, or the court has declared that the statute has become unconstitutional, the court shall render a verdict of innocence to a prosecuted case against which a public prosecution was instituted by applying the pertinent statute in accordance with
Furthermore, on punishment.