beta
(영문) 서울중앙지방법원 2014.07.18 2014고단1567

사기등

Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for a term of one year and eight months.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

"2014 Highest 1567"

1. From May 201, the Defendant had been operating an electronic device design firm called “D” in Gangnam-gu Seoul from around May 201 to around October 201, the victim E residing in the above company and the victim E residing in the above company.

A. On December 22, 2011, the Defendant of the forgery of private document or the uttering of the falsified-gu investigation document stated that the victim would receive a real estate lease contract stating the victim as a joint lessee from the lessor G of the said D office building at the time of the victim’s house located in Gangnam-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government, and that the victim would receive the victim from the lessor G of the said D office building. In the column for the special terms and conditions of the site for the real estate lease contract, the victim stated in the column for the lease “on May 31, 2013, at the expiration of the lease period, at the expiration of May 31, 2013, KRW 00,000,000,000 won for A out of the deposit, shall be paid respectively,” and the lessee stated in the lessee column as “Seoul

The Defendant, who took the above real estate lease contract form to the above D office, entered “Seoul-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government C”, “Seoul-gu0 million won” in the deposit column, and “Ga located in Gangnam-gu Seoul Metropolitan City C” in the lessor column, affixed the G seal which was inserted in advance to the name next to the G’s name.

As a result, the Defendant forged one copy of the G’s private document on rights and obligations, which is a private document related to G’s real estate lease contract, for the purpose of exercising the right, and exercised the forged real estate lease contract as if it were actually formed as a collateral for the borrowed money at the victim’s house on the same day.

B. On December 5, 2011, the Defendant, at the above D office, reads that “The Defendant would lend money to the victim, which is urgently needed, and would be repaid thereafter,” and received KRW 3.7 million in cash from the victim on his/her face, as well as from around that time until January 9, 2012.