A. The facts of recognition 1) The plaintiff (Appointed Party) and the designated parties were officers of the Seo-gu Incheon Metropolitan Council of Residents' Representatives, and the defendant was working as members of the C Apartment Complex 5 Emergency Countermeasures Committee before the council of occupants' representatives. 2) The defendant, on May 3, 2012, at the integrated neighborhood meeting held at the above apartment apartment complex senior citizens' meeting, held a meeting or speak that "the plaintiff (appointed Party) and the designated parties shall increase the construction cost by 30% from the construction company in the process of the apartment underground parking lot construction, and use the remaining construction cost by 70% only in the construction work." However, the judgment of the district court was rendered on February 21, 2012 by pointing out false facts to the purport that "the plaintiff (appointed Party) and the designated parties shall have increased the construction cost by 30% from the construction company in the process of the apartment underground parking lot construction, and the remaining construction cost shall be used by the construction company at the underground parking lot at the same time."

[Reasons for Recognition] Facts without dispute, entry of Gap evidence Nos. 10 and 11 (including each number in the case of additional number), the purport of the whole pleadings

B. According to the above facts of recognition, barring any special circumstance, the defendant recognized that the defendant damaged the reputation of the plaintiff (appointed party) and the designated party by pointing out false facts, and it is obvious in light of the empirical rule that the plaintiff (appointed party) and the designated party suffered mental pain due to the defendant's defamation act as above, and thus, the defendant is obliged to pay mental pain to the plaintiff (appointed party) and the designated party in money.

2. As to the scope of liability for damages and the amount of damages, it is false by the Defendant against the Plaintiff (Appointed Party) and the designated parties.