beta
(영문) 수원지방법원 안양지원 2015.12.04 2015고정957

게임산업진흥에관한법률위반

Text

Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 3,000,000.

If the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won shall be one day.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

Defendant

A (the age of 45, South) is the part-time of “BPC bank”.

A game products related business entity shall not provide game products with information different from the game classification for distribution or use, display or store such information, and shall not engage in business of exchanging tangible or intangible results (referring to score, premiums, virtual currency used in game, which is prescribed by Presidential Decree, and things similar thereto prescribed by Presidential Decree) obtained through the use of the game.

A. Violation of the Game Industry Promotion Act (Provision of game products different from the grade) by the Defendant, from the point of absence of the date on June 2015, the same year;

7. From around 23:00, up to 31:23:00 of the Gyeonggi-do Ansan-si, the “BPC bank” (hereinafter “BPC”) had a game product with the content different from the content of the rating review by receiving cash from customers and directly charging for the game money. On July 21, 2015, around 22:00, the PC used by the control police officers belonging to the Gyeonggi Provincial Police Agency to put the game product into an ID (D) that did not obtain real name certification and adult certification, and directly charged the game money equivalent to 75,000 won by communicating the head office with the police officer to the head office after receiving 75,000 won.

The Defendant provided game products different from those classified as above.

B. Around July 31, 2015, the Defendant exchanged 33,000 won in cash the game money remaining in the police officer’s computer at the same place as the above “A” where the Defendant was operating a money exchange business in which the points and the games, which are the result of the game, remain, were given in cash, at the same time and place as the above “A,” and at the same time and place as the above “A,” in which the Defendant exchanged 33,000 won in cash.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. The protocol of statement to E by the police;