When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

On October 20, 2013, the Defendant had no fact that the victim D violated the crime of breach of trust. However, the Defendant displayed the notice of the result of the disposition of the accusation case (the husband of the Defendant’s complaint against the crime of breach of trust and the dismissal disposition on September 17, 2013) that sent to the husband of the Defendant at the prosecutor’s office among 10 persons such as the senior citizens’ association E, etc. (the husband of the Defendant’s complaint against the crime of breach of trust, and the dismissal disposition on September 17, 2013), stating that “D has committed a crime of breach of trust equivalent to KRW 800 million in the amount of damage caused to the outside painting of the apartment, and was investigated by

Summary of Evidence

1. Partial statement of the defendant;

1. Witnesses D and E's respective legal statements;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes on CDs or recording;

1. Relevant Article 307 (2) of the Criminal Act concerning criminal facts, the choice of a fine, and the choice of a fine;

1. Articles 70 (1) and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act for the detention of a workhouse;

1. It is so decided as per Disposition for not less than Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act.