However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

On January 22, 2019, at around 02:09, the Defendant driven an E CoCo-sports car at the 1km section from the front of the Do in the ethic City B to the front of the D in the same city, while under the influence of alcohol of 0.138%.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. A written statement;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to notify the results of drinking driving control;

1. Relevant Article of the Act on the Crime and Articles 148-2 (2) 2 and 44 (1) of the Road Traffic Act that selects the penalty;

1. Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act;

1. The defendant for the reason of sentencing under Article 62-2 of the Criminal Act of the order to provide community service and attend lectures may choose and punish imprisonment with prison labor in consideration of the fact that he/she has been punished three times from 200 to dact-driving again despite the fact that he/she had been punished for drinking, and a suspended sentence shall be imposed in consideration of the fact that he/she had no record

The punishment as ordered shall be determined in consideration of the degree of blood alcohol, the background of the drinking driving, the distance and place of the drinking driving, and the age, character and behavior, environment, etc. of the defendant.