A shall be punished by imprisonment with prison labor for one year for the crimes of Nos. 1 and 3 in its holding, and imprisonment with prison labor for the crimes of Nos. 2 and 4 and 5 in its holding.

[Criminal Justice] On July 18, 2014, Defendant A was sentenced to a suspension of the execution of six months of imprisonment with prison labor due to the crime of forging official documents at the Goyang Branch of the District Court, which became final and conclusive on July 26, 2014.

【Criminal Facts】

1. The perjury of Defendant A and the perjury of Defendant B (2016Sang815)

A. Defendant A had been pending in the trial as a witness in the case of Goyang branch court 2014Kadan1073, 2014Kadan1073, and Defendant A had been able to instigate B to give false testimony in order to escape B from punishment.

On September 2014 to October 10, 2014, the Defendant called “Neman who was a witness at the bar page in Gangseo-gu, Seoul, referred to as “Neman was a witness, and testimony was made because he had no relation thereto.” On November 201, 2014, the Defendant called “b” to “B from the mutual French page in Gangseo-gu, Seoul to whom he had already been tried, there is no problem, and there is no relation thereto.”

However, there was a fact that the Defendant: (a) stated that he would sell a vehicle to B; and (b) instructed B to commit a theft, such as “no one who spits a tape on the fingers and spits spits in the tape.” (c) by ordering B to commit a specific method of committing a crime, such as “no one who spits a tape.”

Accordingly, the defendant instigated B to give a perjury.

B. Defendant B (1) On November 21, 2014, the Defendant appeared and taken an oath as a witness of the Defendant case, such as Defendant B (i) a special larceny teacher, etc. of the said court, in the court of Dayang-gu District Court Decision 402, 209, Goyang-gu, Goyang-gu, Goyang-si, Goyang-si, Goyang-si, 17:00 on November 21, 2014.

According to the above A’s teachers, the Defendant testified that there was no fact that A did not instruct A to steal his vehicle, and that “the Defendant did not spit the tape on the fingers and spit the spit of the spit of the tape.”

However, facts A.