근로기준법위반
The prosecution of this case is dismissed.
1. The summary of the facts charged is an employer who has operated “D” as a construction business chain by employing three full-time workers in Young-gu, Young-gu C.
The Defendant, without an agreement between the parties on the extension of the due date, provided labor at the aforementioned workplace from March 1, 201 to August 26, 201, and did not pay the total of KRW 1,350,000 to retired workers E within 14 days from the date of retirement.
2. We examine the judgment, and the above facts charged are crimes falling under Articles 109(1) and 36 of the Labor Standards Act, which cannot be prosecuted against the victim’s explicit intent under Article 109(2) of the Labor Standards Act.
However, on November 3, 2015, after the prosecution of this case, workers E expressed his/her intention not to punish in this court through the defendant, so the prosecution of this case is dismissed in accordance with Article 327 subparagraph 6 of the Criminal Procedure Act.