However, the execution of a sentence shall be suspended for a period of two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

On September 10, 2007, the Defendant was issued a summary order of a fine of three million won for a crime of violating the Road Traffic Act at the Ulsan District Court, and on February 17, 2010, the Defendant was sentenced to imprisonment for a violation of the Road Traffic Act at the Daegu District Court, Daegu District Court, and on February 17, 2010, for the same kind of force as the Defendant was sentenced to a suspended sentence of two years for eight months.

On May 8, 2016, the Defendant driven B automobiles while under the influence of alcohol content of about 0.229% in approximately 4km from the parking lot adjacent to “GS convenience store” 1568, Ulsan-gu, Northern-dong, Ulsan-do, to the 1874 daily oil station.

Accordingly, the Defendant, who violated Article 44(1) of the Road Traffic Act not less than twice, driven a motor vehicle under the influence of alcohol again.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Inquiries about the results of crackdown on driving alcohol;

1. Application of investigative reports (report attached to decisions, etc. related to drinking driving force at least twice) and references to inquiries, such as criminal history, shall be made in accordance with statutes;

1. Relevant Article of the Act and Articles 148-2 (1) 1 and 44 (1) of the Road Traffic Act concerning the facts constituting an offense;

1. Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act (see, e.g., Supreme Court Decision 201Da1448, Apr. 1, 20

1. An order to attend a course under Article 62-2 of the Criminal Act;